I received a NanoStation M5 with a firmware of XW.v5.5.9, is there any hope that we will have a release to load on this device or should I send it back?

Douglas W7ADD

How do you delete the text in hamchat or can't you?

Yes, the (original) intention was to make the NTP server plug-n-play at any port by including a DNS server on the same Arduino. I had so much difficulty with that since I was learning too much in too short a period of time (NTP, DNS, IP protocols), that out of frustration, I placed the completed (and wonderfully functional) NTP server on one node and pointed all my other nodes to its address. It allowed me to move on to more pressing issues since I dairy farm and it's Spring. I can email you the Arduino sketch if you wish to play with it.

As it turned out, somewhere along the way I probably had the entire thing working... DNS & NTP but since the nodes wouldn't lock on due to too extreme a time/date difference, I assumed the worst and got more and more frustrated with my efforts. Now that I know that the NTP server works (after loosening the restraints on the ntpclient properties) I'll retry some of my earlier revisions and report back any victories.

Whew! I was able to reinstall the firmware via ssh (via port 2222) using the instructions from openwrt here: http://wiki.openwrt.org/doc/howto/generic.sysupgrade#copy_your_firmware_to_your_router

The key was to use the sysupgrade image.  The factory image causes an error.

Moral of the story: as long as you can connect to the router there is hope!

Jesse,

Try holding the reset button longer than 12 seconds to get a full reset and reboot. There's functionality tied to the reset button and it differs depending on how long you keep it pressed.

-Rusty-

[n6mef 2015-03-26- 16:06:17]:

Given that error message either the file name is getting changed, either by you or the computer you're uploading from, OR the Perl script that generates the Admin page is boogered up.

Could you please post a screenshot JUST BEFORE you press the [Upload] button when you get the error message?

After that, please stop the frustration and just upload the full .trx file. :)

Check the release notes:

http://www.broadband-hamnet.org/download/firmware/ubnt/310/release-notes-3.1.0.pdf

On the sixth page (the pages aren't numbered, jeez) read "DMZ and LAN Port Distinctions". 

Granted, description of fundamental functionality is NOT something that should be buried in the release notes.  In fact, it ought to be visible on the config screen.  For example "WAN (VLAN 1)", or something similar.  But user documentation is not a strong suite of this project.

Michael

N6MEF

I have started a new Yahoo Group as a site to share info on Metro Phoenix mesh activities. We also have installed a few high profile nodes in the East Valley at 2500' ASL and are looking for some connections.

Give the group a visit for full information.  Let's get meshing..

https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/MetroPhoenixMeshRadio/info

73, Dave K7DMK   Mesa, AZ

Running Linksys WRT54G nodes and I have the same problem.  Getting the same error when trying to install the patch to go from 3.0.0 to 3.1.0.  I have checked and checked again to make sure I have the right file and I do.... any suggestions?

Running Linksys WRT54G nodes and I have the same problem.  Getting the same error when trying to install the patch to go from 3.0.0 to 3.1.0.  I have checked and checked again to make sure I have the right file and I do.... any suggestions?

OK. I've mistakenly installed the 3.1.0 Linksys patch on my Ubiquiti nano loco M2!  Is there any way to recover?

The router appears to be running, I can ssh into it.  But when I try to get to the web interface (http://localnode:8080) I get the following message:

"The CGI process did not produce any response"

Is there anyway to recover? I've tried holding the reset button to start tftp but the router wont go into tftp mode.

Help!

-Jesse

It looks like I'm going to miss Ham-ex, so I'll miss your booth. Watch for our emissaries from the Hamilton Amateur Radio Club; I've asked them to visit on my behalf.

Are there any discussions going on about tunneling? Now that it's dead simple to set up, seems like a decent way to attach our many 'island' nets to the larger mesh. In Hamilton, we have a decent hub at our repeater site, but no members live close enough to connect via RF. You have a better line of sight across the bay to our site than any of us have. Ironic, eh?

I have a BBHN 3.1 tunnel server set up at my home QTH with unlimited broadband just itching for a few connections. Given that I live in an area that prevents me from connecting anywhere via RF, tunneling is an attractive feature that I'd like to explore.