|
Broadband-Hamnet™ Forum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subject :Re:Re:Re:Virtual Tunnels..
2014-10-14- 01:25:16
|
|
|
AE6XE |
|
Member |
|
Joined: 2013-11-05- 00:09:51
Posts: 116
Location: |
|
|
|
Forum :
General
Topic :
Virtual Tunnels
I'll create the new 12-vpnrouting rules--to sustain/reduce the security vulnerability level for tun* interfaces. |
IP Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subject :Re:how to find correct version?..
2014-10-14- 01:12:47
|
|
|
AE6XE |
|
Member |
|
Joined: 2013-11-05- 00:09:51
Posts: 116
Location: |
|
|
|
Forum :
Firmware
Topic :
how to find correct version?
Larry, version "2" or "v2" is what has been showing in the 'SSID' (can see by doing the "wifi scan" button from the mesh status page. Look for firmware version 1.1.2 on the download page. There is an experimental section on the download page and the numbers are now synced up so that "v3" is "3.0.0". Nodes are only compatible of the same version.
Joe AE6XE |
IP Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subject :Re:Signal to noise ratio..
2014-10-14- 01:01:10
|
|
|
AE6XE |
|
Member |
|
Joined: 2013-11-05- 00:09:51
Posts: 116
Location: |
|
|
|
Forum :
Problems & Answers
Topic :
Signal to noise ratio
I had purchased this filter prior to the release of bbhn for ubiquiti.
http://www.l-com.com/bandpass-filter-rf-splitter-24-ghz-ultra-high-q-8-pole-outdoor-bandpass-filter-channel-1-2412-mhz
Joe AE6XE |
IP Logged
|
Last Edited On: 2014-10-14- 01:02:38 By AE6XE for the Reason
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subject :how to find correct version?..
2014-10-13- 23:52:30
|
|
|
KB8EMD |
|
Member |
|
Joined: 2014-03-31- 22:03:23
Posts: 12
Location: |
|
|
|
Forum :
Firmware
Topic :
how to find correct version?
I have a Linksys WRT54G V.3 it has firmware version 1.0.0 I was told I needed to down load firmware version 2 when I look at the download page I can not tell which one I need I don't understand the method used all I see are version's 1.something not version 2. something would someone help this old man to understand what I need to do?
thanks Larry KB8EMD
|
IP Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subject :Re:Signal to noise ratio..
2014-10-13- 19:52:38
|
|
|
9h1bw |
|
Member |
|
Joined: 2014-10-12- 07:26:44
Posts: 4
Location: |
|
|
|
Forum :
Problems & Answers
Topic :
Signal to noise ratio
Thank you for your reply. I am now in a much better position to understand what is going on. I have copied your reply to my fellow ham and will discuss what to do to resolve our difficulties . In fact we have been looking at the ubiquiti routers especially because we need to create a bridge of some 10 km. thus we are considering getting the air grid model. what type of filter have you used to filter channel 1? |
IP Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subject :Re:Virtual Tunnels..
2014-10-13- 18:34:41
|
|
|
KG6JEI |
|
Member |
|
Joined: 2013-12-02- 19:52:05
Posts: 516
Location: |
|
|
|
Forum :
General
Topic :
Virtual Tunnels
Yes it is, but as done it would be a regression of the BBHN->ticket:35 (a tunnel link could force its way to use your internet because of rules 30290,32766 It also leaks the nodes when in nat mode too. The 30200+ rules are meant to be used by the node itself for finding everything it may need to connect to, not to be used by traffic actually traversing the mesh itself (which a vpnlink side would be)
|
IP Logged
|
Note: Most posts submitted from iPhone |
|
|
|
|
|
Subject :Re:Re:Re:Virtual Tunnels..
2014-10-13- 18:28:34
|
|
|
AE6XE |
|
Member |
|
Joined: 2013-11-05- 00:09:51
Posts: 116
Location: |
|
|
|
Forum :
General
Topic :
Virtual Tunnels
re: /etc/hotplug.d/iface/11-meshrouting
Conrad, Looks like it is still catching default rules to see the olsrd routes for these new interfaces, DEVICE=tun0:
30210:from all lookup 29
30220: from all lookup 30
30290: from all lookup main
30299: from all lookup 31
32766: from all lookup main
32767: from all lookup default |
IP Logged
|
Last Edited On: 2014-10-13- 18:29:38 By AE6XE for the Reason
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subject :Re:Virtual Tunnels..
2014-10-13- 18:21:09
|
|
|
KG6JEI |
|
Member |
|
Joined: 2013-12-02- 19:52:05
Posts: 516
Location: |
|
|
|
Forum :
General
Topic :
Virtual Tunnels
Ah I see why it works, rules 30200-30299 that I set to all interfaces when the loopback comes up allows it to traverse the node. So not so surprising it works.
A new 12-vpnrouting policy should still be created however following similar to the dtdlink policy to ensure we don't have a regression and introduce the security flaw previously seen in 1.0.x
|
IP Logged
|
Note: Most posts submitted from iPhone |
|
|
|
|
|
Subject :Re:Re:Airborne Nodes - Your thoughts?..
2014-10-13- 14:05:14
|
|
|
kc2mut |
|
Member |
|
Joined: 2014-10-12- 17:48:52
Posts: 3
Location: New York |
|
|
|
Forum :
How we used HSMM-MESH™
Topic :
Airborne Nodes - Your thoughts?
Max flight time for a battery powered multirotor drone would be 25min and fixed wing about 45min. With a gas powered fixed wing you can get 24 hours.
The commercial versions have the ability to carry +2 pound payload and autonomous fligh but have a price tag of $50,000! A tethered RC blimp or balloon is ideal. Also no issues with FAA. I once mounted a wifi hotspot to a multirotor but wasn't satisfied with the results. I am also looking in to using a Mesh Node mounted to a tethered balloon.
[K7BCV 2014-10-13- 07:18:48]: An experimental aircraft would be fun, but this might be better done by a drone. Have you thought about that approach? |
IP Logged
|
Last Edited On: 2014-10-13- 16:07:41 By kc2mut for the Reason
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subject :Re:Virtual Tunnels..
2014-10-13- 13:07:43
|
|
|
KG6JEI |
|
Member |
|
Joined: 2013-12-02- 19:52:05
Posts: 516
Location: |
|
|
|
Forum :
General
Topic :
Virtual Tunnels
Take a look at /etc/hotplug.d/iface/11-meshrouting I'm actually surprised your getting across 2 hops at the moment, that should not be the case on quick thought as the right table should not be being consulted. This was part of securing the network from inadvertent routing done in 1.1.0 release (and is the biggest reason why the document needs to be re-written from 1.0.0/1.0.1)
|
IP Logged
|
Note: Most posts submitted from iPhone |
|
|
|
|
|
Subject :Re:Re:Re:Virtual Tunnels..
2014-10-13- 13:02:56
|
|
|
AE6XE |
|
Member |
|
Joined: 2013-11-05- 00:09:51
Posts: 116
Location: |
|
|
|
Forum :
General
Topic :
Virtual Tunnels
Conrad, I didn't have any further routing defined beyond the 2 nodes at both ends of the tunnel able to ping each other on the 172.31.x.x address. Relying on olsrd to handle all the route tables entries to get to the multi-hop nodes across both meshes (from each node's perspective). olsr status page in my test showed all the appropriate routing to all nodes on both sides of the tunnel. Tested with streaming video across the tunnel and 2 hops in. This is not a multiple client setup--would need more firewall settings and maybe 172.x.x.x route entry for multiple client connections. |
IP Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subject :Re:Virtual Tunnels..
2014-10-13- 12:21:58
|
|
|
KG6JEI |
|
Member |
|
Joined: 2013-12-02- 19:52:05
Posts: 516
Location: |
|
|
|
Forum :
General
Topic :
Virtual Tunnels
Joe: Quick glanced your tar file. I don't see any handling of the routing table entries in your setup files. might of missed it, but important to look into otherwise routes will likely not work correctly except for one hop nodes if it isn't there.
|
IP Logged
|
Note: Most posts submitted from iPhone |
|
|
|
|
|
Subject :RFF: 3.0.0 beta and 5/10MHz RF bandwidth SNR LQ..
2014-10-13- 12:07:59
|
|
|
KG6JEI |
|
Member |
|
Joined: 2013-12-02- 19:52:05
Posts: 516
Location: |
|
|
|
Forum :
Developer's Forum
Topic :
RFF: 3.0.0 beta and 5/10MHz RF bandwidth SNR LQ
Request For Feedback Version: 3.0.0 beta Any feedback users have on using in the real world with 5MHz and 10MHz channels compared to 20MHz channels and the effect on the Link Quality and SNR readings woudl be appreciated.
|
IP Logged
|
Note: Most posts submitted from iPhone |
|
|
|
|
|
Subject :Re:Mesh Tunnels..
2014-10-13- 11:38:58
|
|
|
kc2zqo |
|
Member |
|
Joined: 2013-11-25- 18:52:22
Posts: 6
Location: |
|
|
|
Forum :
L.I./NYC
Topic :
Mesh Tunnels
Sure Look for the e-mail. |
IP Logged
|
Asterisk |
|
|
|
|
|
Subject :Re:Virtual Tunnels..
2014-10-13- 11:19:31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subject :Re:Cannot reset Linksys modem..
2014-10-13- 09:46:25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subject :Re:Airborne Nodes - Your thoughts?..
2014-10-13- 07:18:48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subject :Re:Airborne Nodes - Your thoughts?..
2014-10-13- 06:50:45
|
|
|
AE6XE |
|
Member |
|
Joined: 2013-11-05- 00:09:51
Posts: 116
Location: |
|
|
|
Forum :
How we used HSMM-MESH™
Topic :
Airborne Nodes - Your thoughts?
From a cost perspective, an airplane may not be practical, but yet a fun experiment. I'd give it a try once or twice. Local 100LL is over $7/gal here. A 3 hour flight to support an incident @ ~8GPH in a c172 is ~$170 not to mention maintenance costs. Just need to figure out how to mount something like a 2-channel 19dB flatpanel-sector antenna pointing straight down. Clamp on a strut with the hurricane certified antenna?
I have a node at 2600' with the homes below ~800' in the area with a range out 20+ miles. Somewhat comparable to flying over an incident. Being straight overhead in a holding pattern would probably be better as most home users point their antennas straight up and donut propagate outward. |
IP Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subject :Re:Signal to noise ratio..
2014-10-13- 06:17:36
|
|
|
AE6XE |
|
Member |
|
Joined: 2013-11-05- 00:09:51
Posts: 116
Location: |
|
|
|
Forum :
Problems & Answers
Topic :
Signal to noise ratio
My experience is, yes. I found that a ch1 filter made a big difference--more so than adding an amp. However, before buying such devices, the ubiquiti hardware is same or lower cost and accomplishes the same thing. The linksys hardware is many years old and the receiver sensitivity and ability to deal in a congested environment, let's just say, have room for improvement.
There are also the usual techniques:
1) directional antennas vs. omni receiving signals from everywhere
2) act as neighborhood freq coordinator and delicately ask neighbors to move up to ch 6 or above. (many iphone/android apps to track signals down.)
Just in case, ch1 and ch3 have overlap of bandwidth. ch3 has overlap from ch1 up to ch7--bigger potential for competing signals/noise in the middle, where as ch1 has overlap from ch1 to ch5. Manufactor's default on ch1, 6, and 11 for clear separation. |
IP Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subject :Re:Airborne Nodes - Your thoughts?..
2014-10-13- 02:55:12
|
|
|
|
|
|