|
Broadband-Hamnet™ Forum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subject :Re:Port Forwarding WAN port 80 to Rpi webserver attached to node..
2014-07-23- 15:00:46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subject :Re:Port Forwarding WAN port 80 to Rpi webserver attached to node..
2014-07-23- 12:46:29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subject :Re:Port Forwarding WAN port 80 to Rpi webserver attached to node..
2014-07-23- 10:52:32
|
|
|
AE5CA |
|
Member |
|
Joined: 2012-05-19- 21:52:33
Posts: 81
Location: |
|
|
|
Forum :
Problems & Answers
Topic :
Port Forwarding WAN port 80 to Rpi webserver attached to node
Ticket 48 was written to address this issue. It looks like it is still present in 1.1.2. I can confirm that I have been able to forward port 80 to the wan using a Rocket M2 and a Netgear GS105E or GS108E Ethernet switch with the switch programmed to tag the WAN Connection as VLAN 1 before continuing on to the Rocket. My friend that had the original problem has since switched to a NanoStation M2 and he is also able to port forward to Port 80. I believe this is just a matter of adding the right line in iptables but I am not 100% sure of the command. Clint, AE5CA
|
IP Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subject :Re:Port Forwarding WAN port 80 to Rpi webserver attached to node..
2014-07-23- 10:18:36
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subject :Re:VLAN's..
2014-07-23- 08:19:42
|
|
|
KC0IQW |
|
Member |
|
Joined: 2014-05-31- 14:04:25
Posts: 1
Location: |
|
|
|
Forum :
How we used HSMM-MESH™
Topic :
VLAN's
Since VLANs are being covered, is it possible to add a VLAN that is NAT'ed? I need to keep some routed IP's for VoIP as trying to traverse NAT is an issue. At the same time this limits the number of devices. I tried to set up a new VLAN with NAT. The devices would get IP addresses from the new NAT'ed network but could not access other mesh nodes. |
IP Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subject :Re:Mesh in the UK..
2014-07-23- 07:05:13
|
|
|
M0HER |
|
Member |
|
Joined: 2012-11-18- 07:24:42
Posts: 8
Location: |
|
|
|
Forum :
General
Topic :
Mesh in the UK
After reading through the information, it states that the whole section is for amateur satellite use, and if there are no satellite operators in the area to interfere with, then the bands can be used for amateur TV. It doesn't state that data equipment can be used.
I know that the 2.4GHz spectrum is licence free and channel 1 is within that allocation, but is it still legal if the system is used as the mesh instead of a home wireless point?
Jack. |
IP Logged
|
Last Edited On: 2014-07-23- 09:11:35 By M0HER for the Reason
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subject :Re:Scripts on the Router..
2014-07-23- 05:03:16
|
|
|
AE4ML |
|
Member |
|
Joined: 2014-06-01- 15:17:42
Posts: 47
Location: Spotsylvania VA USA |
|
|
|
Forum :
Problems & Answers
Topic :
Scripts on the Router
I agree there is no need to reboot the router and cause the mesh to re-converge constantly. This could be a bad cable , a route re-convergence. a bad or dropped route. I would be checking form the internet side and identify where the problem is located. From the mesh side what can you ping ? take this in steps and lets see where its broke.
This is going to sound rather simple but it will tell us something about what is working.
With a laptop on the mesh network. Can you ping yourself ? Can you ping other devices on the same subnet ? if yes then you have local access. if no then you have a problem right there with the laptop or a switch.
assuming everything is good to this point. Can you ping the IP of the internet gateway ? Can you ping beyond that ?
Move the laptop to the ISP side and repeat the tests going back into the mesh. Ping yourself. the first IP going into the mesh. Another device on the mesh. Where did it fail ? |
IP Logged
|
Michael Lussier
AE4ML
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subject :Re:Scripts on the Router..
2014-07-23- 04:43:30
|
|
|
K6AH |
|
Member |
|
Joined: 2012-03-05- 10:47:45
Posts: 181
Location: San Diego, CA |
|
|
|
Forum :
Problems & Answers
Topic :
Scripts on the Router
Hei Per. Hyggelig å se mesh implementeringer i Norge. Jeg er fra Drammen, men har bodd i USA siden jeg var barn.
Andre, K6AH |
IP Logged
|
Member of:
Beta Test Team
San Diego Mesh Working Group
Running 3.0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Subject :Re:Firmware Installation..
2014-07-23- 03:47:11
|
|
|
KD9ABV |
|
Member |
|
Joined: 2014-07-14- 13:08:57
Posts: 2
Location: |
|
|
|
Forum :
UBNT Firmware
Topic :
Firmware Installation
I disabled my non connected wireless device and was able to connect in via http://192.168.1.1:8080
:) |
IP Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subject :Re:Firmware Installation..
2014-07-23- 03:42:20
|
|
|
KD9ABV |
|
Member |
|
Joined: 2014-07-14- 13:08:57
Posts: 2
Location: |
|
|
|
Forum :
UBNT Firmware
Topic :
Firmware Installation
I did the same thing. Flashed with the firmware in airOS. Changed to automatically obtain IP. Rebooted, unplugged bullet. waited a minute. Plugged everything back in. Still unable to get to it via the gateway address.
tried 192.168.1.1 and 192.168.1.1:8080 localnode:8080
Cannot get the airOS webpage to come up.
I am able to ping 192.168.1.1 |
IP Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subject :Re:HSMM-MESH in Utah..
2014-07-22- 15:27:14
|
|
|
K2CTC |
|
Member |
|
Joined: 2014-07-22- 17:23:38
Posts: 1
Location: Ogden, UT |
|
|
|
Forum :
Utah
Topic :
HSMM-MESH in Utah
Greetings All, My name is Chris (K2CTC) and I just purchased a WRT54GL to configure as a HSMM-MESH node. The device has not arrived yet, but I am excited to play with the technology. I would appear that this forum is the place to be if you are in Utah and interested in mesh. I will post an update once I get things up and running. |
IP Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subject :Re:Scripts on the Router..
2014-07-22- 09:19:08
|
|
|
KG6JEI |
|
Member |
|
Joined: 2013-12-02- 19:52:05
Posts: 516
Location: |
|
|
|
Forum :
Problems & Answers
Topic :
Scripts on the Router
I am curious, Why are you rebooting the node if internet is lost ? Nodes can still be very useful even if they don't have internet, putting it in a reboot loop every 5 minutes would degrade the network, and if you have an entire area internet outage and this is on lots of nodes you could take your entire mesh network down at once as all the nodes going into constant reboot cycles (a cascade failure)
|
IP Logged
|
Note: Most posts submitted from iPhone |
|
|
|
|
|
Subject :Re:Scripts on the Router..
2014-07-22- 07:59:09
|
|
|
LA3QSA |
|
Member |
|
Joined: 2014-06-27- 14:53:46
Posts: 2
Location: |
|
|
|
Forum :
Problems & Answers
Topic :
Scripts on the Router
Nevermind, found a persistent storage in /jffs/usr/bin/ and storred the script there.
if anyone is interested, the i used this script to get the job done:
#/bin/sh
count=$((`ping -c 3 8.8.8.8 | grep -c '64 bytes'`))
if [ $count -le 1 ]
then `echo "timeout" >> /tmp/network_watchdog` # add timeout to watchdog
else `> /tmp/network_watchdog` # reset timeouts
fi
count=$((`cat /tmp/network_watchdog | grep -c "timeout"`)) # count occurred timeouts
if [ $count -ge 5 ]
then
'/sbin/reboot` #reboot if more than 5 concurrent timeouts
fi |
IP Logged
|
Last Edited On: 2014-07-22- 08:01:33 By LA3QSA for the Reason Formating error when pasting script from editor
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subject :Re:decent LQ but only see IP address..
2014-07-22- 06:57:36
|
|
|
AE6XE |
|
Member |
|
Joined: 2013-11-05- 00:09:51
Posts: 116
Location: |
|
|
|
Forum :
Problems & Answers
Topic :
decent LQ but only see IP address
I've been doing "Wifi Scan" (or wscan command line) to see the competition on channel 1. A lot of people in the parks, particularly RV parks, may lead to an increase in wifi traffic. One would think everyone wants to get away from it all now days, but this doesn't seem to reflect on getting away from the internet :). We've been having low LQ issues with a node on City Hall (EOC and library). I found this past weekend that there are 31! channel 1 wifi APs with 10 having stronger signals than the distant node we're trying to stay connected with. There are 12 more APs on ch 6 and 11. |
IP Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subject :Re:decent LQ but only see IP address..
2014-07-22- 04:49:01
|
|
|
K6AH |
|
Member |
|
Joined: 2012-03-05- 10:47:45
Posts: 181
Location: San Diego, CA |
|
|
|
Forum :
Problems & Answers
Topic :
decent LQ but only see IP address
That's a high noise level. I would definitely try horizontal polarization. On the multipath question, you need to be sure the Freznel Zone is clear (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fresnel_zone). You can estimate the required clearance using the formula: 36*sqrt(miles/GHz)=clearance in feet. Using 15 miles and 2.4GHz, that results in a clearance requirement of about 90' above and below the beam at the midpoint between the two nodes: 36*sqrt(15/2.4)= 36*sqrt(6.25)= 36*2.5=90’ So check to be sure that area isn't obstructed in any way. However, again I'll suggest Ubiquiti gear in a scenario such as this. You will gain nearly 10dB in receiver sensitivity (which will help when you get the noise issue resolved) and nearly 10dB in higher power output. I don't have any experience in circular polarization. Andre, K6AH |
IP Logged
|
Member of:
Beta Test Team
San Diego Mesh Working Group
Running 3.0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Subject :Scripts on the Router..
2014-07-22- 04:39:35
|
|
|
LA3QSA |
|
Member |
|
Joined: 2014-06-27- 14:53:46
Posts: 2
Location: |
|
|
|
Forum :
Problems & Answers
Topic :
Scripts on the Router
Hi All,
I have tried to install a script to check internet connectivity, and reboot a remote node if the connectivity has been gone for more than five minutes, this script was supposed to be executed by cron every minute. Where do I store the script on the hsmm firmware image to persist between reboots?
73 and Best Regards LA3QSA Per Øyvind
|
IP Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subject :Re:decent LQ but only see IP address..
2014-07-22- 03:45:53
|
|
|
N7RTA |
|
Member |
|
Joined: 2012-06-18- 15:07:26
Posts: 4
Location: |
|
|
|
Forum :
Problems & Answers
Topic :
decent LQ but only see IP address
Thank you both for your replies! our remote site node is co-located with a 2 meter and 70 cm repeater. but, there are lots of commercial transmitters close by. the router shows a noise floor of ~-70 dBm. the antenna used on the remote site is a commercially built sector array (HBW=90 degrees, VBW=7.5 degrees, gain ~16 dBi) we are wondering also if multi-path is a factor. on the node opposite the remote site (located in a park), when lots of people show up, the signal levels really start to vary. i have read several articles where circular polarization was used to mitigate multi-path. has anyone experimented with circular polarization?
thanks for your help! N7RTA
|
IP Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subject :Re:DHCP assigning 192.168.1.23, can't find the node..
2014-07-22- 02:23:13
|
|
|
kd8wpi |
|
Member |
|
Joined: 2014-04-01- 06:04:56
Posts: 2
Location: |
|
|
|
Forum :
Problems & Answers
Topic :
DHCP assigning 192.168.1.23, can't find the node
I was able to recover back to the Ubiquiti OEM firmware using TFTP. I just tried attempted another upload of the BBHN firmware (1.0.1) and I am back to the same problem. I uploaded the 1.0.1 version a few more times and could never get to the config screen. I uploaded the 1.1.2 firmware, I can configure just fine. I was able to upload the 1.1.2 firmware, then downgrade back to the 1.0.1 firmware, and everything is working fine now. |
IP Logged
|
Last Edited On: 2014-07-22- 03:55:54 By kd8wpi for the Reason
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subject :DHCP assigning 192.168.1.23, can't find the node..
2014-07-22- 01:19:36
|
|
|
kd8wpi |
|
Member |
|
Joined: 2014-04-01- 06:04:56
Posts: 2
Location: |
|
|
|
Forum :
Problems & Answers
Topic :
DHCP assigning 192.168.1.23, can't find the node
I just flashed a Ubiquiti Bullet with bbhn-1.01-ar71xx-ubnt-bullet-m-squashfs-factory.bin After the firmware upload was complete, the DHCP in the bullet is assigning my computer an IP: 192.168.1.23, instead of one of the Class A addresses the rest of the mesh nodes assign. DHCP also assigns a gateway of 192.168.1.1. I try to ping that IP, and there is nothing there. A broadcast ping did not reveal any other IP's on the LAN. Did I brick my bullet? How can I recover?
Edit: I should have mentioned that localnode:8080 does not get to the config screen either. |
IP Logged
|
Last Edited On: 2014-07-22- 02:00:47 By kd8wpi for the Reason
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subject :Re:Mesh in the UK..
2014-07-21- 19:20:41
|
|
|
GM7HHB |
|
Member |
|
Joined: 2014-02-02- 07:02:51
Posts: 3
Location: |
|
|
|
Forum :
General
Topic :
Mesh in the UK
Correct me if I'm wrong (and I maybe) but :
http://thersgb.org/services/bandplans/html/rsgb_band_plan_jan_2014-1.htm
and broadband-hamnet uses channel 1 (2412Mhz) by default (I did check this using my wispy 2.4)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_WLAN_channels
This would mean we are using the section allocated to the satellite service on secondary basis, we also have to tolerate noise from ISM.
I was of the understanding that it was only the frequencies the were below 2400mhz that were being removed. (as is stated in the band plan)
Here's the full OFCOM statement for your enjoyment ...
http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/consultations/public-sector-spectrum-release/statement/PSSR_amateur_statement.pdf
On the Ubiquiti devices, I picked up a bullet M2 with high gain antenna for under £100 on ebay. Pays to shop around.
On the 5.Ghz, our D-Star repeater GB7DE is linked to the internet using some Deliberant kit over 6 miles, total cost for that was under £200.
I wouldn't say cost is really a factor now. |
IP Logged
|
|
|
|
|