|
Broadband-Hamnet™ Forum :: General |
|
|
|
|
|
Subject :Port Forwarding in v1.0.0..
2013-08-13- 17:14:47
|
|
|
| N6GKJ |
|
| Member |
 |
Joined: 2013-07-03- 21:48:41
Posts: 8
Location: Lodi, CA CM98 |
|
|
|
|
|
I cant seem to forward ports in V1.0.0 to the WiFi interface, seems to be locked on the WAN port.
Is this broken or do I need to roll back to 0.4.3?
In my app, I need to forward ports to the WIFI interface...
What did I miss? |
IP Logged
|
73,
Ron Simpson
N6GKJATV Meshing!! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subject :Re:Port Forwarding in v1.0.0..
2013-08-14- 16:46:07
|
|
|
| AD5OO |
|
| Admin |
 |
Joined: 2010-01-18- 23:05:42
Posts: 37
Location: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
What is your app? And why do you need port forwarding when you can directly access everything on your node's LAN?
|
|
IP Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subject :Re:Port Forwarding in v1.0.0..
2013-08-14- 17:04:32
|
|
|
| N6GKJ |
|
|
| Member |
|
Joined: 2013-07-03- 21:48:41
Posts: 8
Location: Lodi, CA CM98 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
I have webpages that look at the WIFI address. When I try to use the LAN address, since they are different networks, the webcam server does not pick up the cams on other nodes |
|
IP Logged
|
73,
Ron Simpson
N6GKJATV Meshing!! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subject :Re:Port Forwarding in v1.0.0..
2013-08-15- 01:16:41
|
|
|
| SM7I |
|
| Member |
|
Joined: 2012-04-30- 14:56:55
Posts: 79
Location: JO65mo |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The new 1.0.0 firmware uses routing by default, ie you don´t have to do any NAT or portforwarding in order to reach LAN side resources from other nodes. Just make sure the routing works by simply send a ping from one LAN side resource to another LAN side resource and if that works you will have traffic flow. |
|
IP Logged
|
|
IT infrastructure and security professional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subject :Re:Port Forwarding in v1.0.0..
2013-08-15- 17:07:40
|
|
|
| N6GKJ |
|
|
| Member |
|
Joined: 2013-07-03- 21:48:41
Posts: 8
Location: Lodi, CA CM98 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
This does not work as described for me:
node1 WiFI is x.x.x.x
node1 LAN is 10.16.30.17
node1 user ron-laptop is 10.16.30.18 running a webcam on port:8081
node2 WiFi is x.x.x.x
node2 LAN is 10.30.25
node2 user laptop is 10.16.30.30 running a webcam on port:8081
from the "Mesh Status" page I can click the link and view the webcam, that works fine. However, if I ping laptop on node2 from ron-laptop on node1 I resolve the name to the proper IP, but no packets are being passed through the router. The same happens in the reverse.
The webserver that serves all my webcams looks for the local-lan names and tries to serve the streams. No packets are being routed through.
How can I get around this on v1.0.0?
I cannot ping any LOCAL LAN IP address on any other node from any other node. |
|
IP Logged
|
73,
Ron Simpson
N6GKJATV Meshing!! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subject :Re:Port Forwarding in v1.0.0..
2013-08-15- 20:12:01
|
|
|
| SM7I |
|
|
| Member |
|
Joined: 2012-04-30- 14:56:55
Posts: 79
Location: JO65mo |
|
|
|
|
|
|
You say that node 1 laptop with camera is 10.16.30.18 and you say that node 2 laptop with camera is 10.16.30.30.
Are you sure you set it up this way ?
This will not work.
If you have two clients with the same networksubnet, but behind different routers there will be no routing since the IP and mask on each of the laptops will search their local network and never go through the router.
This is why the packages will never go through the router, just as you write.
You need to have different subnets on each of your routers LAN sides. |
|
IP Logged
|
|
Last Edited On: 2013-08-15- 20:12:53 By SM7I for the Reason cosmetic |
|
IT infrastructure and security professional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subject :Re:Port Forwarding in v1.0.0..
2013-08-16- 14:05:47
|
|
|
| N6GKJ |
|
|
| Member |
|
Joined: 2013-07-03- 21:48:41
Posts: 8
Location: Lodi, CA CM98 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ok, yes I am sure this is how it is set up, the netmask for each subnet is 255.255.255.248, so technically they are not on the same subnet, but I can see how the routing can get confused. also I am running in the "Direct 5" mode on all but one of my nodes, the other is a "Direct 13" node. So all of these LOCAL IP's are auto generated by the node its self. |
|
IP Logged
|
73,
Ron Simpson
N6GKJATV Meshing!! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subject :Re:Port Forwarding in v1.0.0..
2013-08-16- 22:36:49
|
|
|
| SM7I |
|
|
| Member |
|
Joined: 2012-04-30- 14:56:55
Posts: 79
Location: JO65mo |
|
|
|
|
|
|
OK, yes that follows with that mask.
As long as you follow the IP subnet defined on respective LAN interface on each router you should have no problem.
If you are familiar with TCPdump you can install it on your routers. That will make troubleshooting easier. |
|
IP Logged
|
|
IT infrastructure and security professional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subject :Re:Port Forwarding in v1.0.0..
2013-08-20- 10:48:38
|
|
|
| kd8rbh |
|
| Member |
|
Joined: 2013-08-19- 22:05:20
Posts: 28
Location: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
I am also having this exact problem to a T with v1.0.0
Please help! The Internet through the nodes are working just not able to access other nodes pc. |
|
IP Logged
|
|
|
|
|
