Am I just missing it, or, is there no search functionality in the forums?

I see the site search, but, not forum search.

Darryl - K5DLQ

Hi:

today by first time, I see the neighbour stations from USA in my station.

I am seeing The  Swedish stations ok, about 3 weeks,  

I suppose that Johan SM7I, has completed the link to the USA network.

Excelent work, Johan, thanks for your help!!

The router now is in test phase in my shack, in a few days I will  mount in the roof on the mast reserved for this with a onmi 6 dbs antenna, and put the 2,4 ghz signal in my area.

I wait that other Spanish hams will connect in a future.

node name : http;//eb5jeq-24:8080

73s.

Miguel EB5JEQ www.eb5jeq.es

Howdy everyone!

I just got on the air – mesh – as KW7B-5, with a Ubiquity air Grid M2 HP. So far I see no signals from other mesh nodes.

I wanted to ask if there is a polarization protocol for our area? Will the majority of operators going to use horizontal polarization? Or will the polarization priority be vertical?

Has anyone tried to reflect signals off of the buildings along the big hill in Portland? The hill with their hospitals is the one I mean.

And, are there any social or practical/workgroup gatherings for mesh users in the Portland area?

73 for now C1 13 cm

Rick, KW7B

Southeast 28th and Powell area.

In Sweden we have now, on trial, installed the Racoon IPSec VPN server on our gateway, which makes it possible to connect to the BBHN/HSMM/AMPRnet network behind the gateway using a regular client such as iPhone, Windows, Mac, Linux or whatever.

This gives the opportunety to do a real live demo, among other things, from your clubhouse or such.

We have also connected to a large BBHN network based in New Mexico US, also one node in Barcelona Spain is connected.

We are happy to announce that the system is very stable and reliable.

In Sweden we have now, on trial, installed the Racoon IPSec VPN server on our gateway, which makes it possible to connect to the BBHN/HSMM/AMPRnet network behind the gateway using a regular client such as iPhone, Windows, Mac, Linux or whatever.

This gives the opportunety to do a real live demo, among other things, from your clubhouse or such.

We have also connected to a large BBHN network based in New Mexico US, also one node in Barcelona Spain is connected.

We are happy to announce that the system is very stable and reliable.

Thanks Clint: while the V3 may be the one to use at this time I would be the only one in our group we all are very new just getting our feet wet. Our last meeting while informative I found out some of the group has changed to V2 from V1 and didn't tell the rest of the group. "They" are the ones with the most installed gear I will bring up the need to have a way to let us all know when there is a group change that needs to be made. if what you say about V2 is true we all should change to V3. it does no one any good if my node can't talk to the other nodes. thanks for the heads up Larry

Question, when defining multiple vtun clients, what do I need to do to my /etc/config/network file regarding the mtmlink sections...

ie. Currently, i have:
...
#### mesh to mesh configuration
config interface mtmlink
option ifname "tun0"
option proto none
...

However, I have 4 different tun* interfaces (ie. tun0, tun1, tun2, tun3)

Do I need to change the network file to:
#### mesh to mesh configuration
config interface mtmlink
option ifname "tun0,tun1,tun2,tun3"
option proto none

any guidance from those who have multiple client connection abilities?

I would highly encourage you to skip the 1.1.2 version and go directly to 3.0.0.  Yes the 3.0.0 is listed as "experimental", but 1.1.2 has to many problems to be used in a production environment.  3.0.0 has fixed or mitigated the problems and in my opinion is a much better product than 1.1.2. 

3.0.0 is not backward compatible with 1.1.2 so the entire mesh will need to update.

Clint, AE5CA

Clearing my browser's cache fixed it, thanks!

Works here. Delete your browser's cache and try again.