|
Broadband-Hamnet™ Forum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subject :Re:Email - Looking for hints..
2014-07-12- 17:48:30
|
|
|
KG6JEI |
|
Member |
 |
Joined: 2013-12-02- 19:52:05
Posts: 516
Location: |
|
|
|
Forum :
Problems & Answers
Topic :
Email - Looking for hints
You shouldn't need an MX record, and we don't have an ability to publish them. The email standard is lookup an mx record, if none found lookup an A record (which we do publish IF your advertising the name as a reserved name). If A record found deliver to that IP address. |
IP Logged
|
Note: Most posts submitted from iPhone |
|
|
|
|
|
Subject :Re:Ubiquiti devices..
2014-07-12- 16:34:34
|
|
|
K6AH |
|
Member |
 |
Joined: 2012-03-05- 10:47:45
Posts: 181
Location: San Diego, CA |
|
|
|
Forum :
Hardware
Topic :
Ubiquiti devices
Hi Jacob, I'm not sure what you mean by Web router... but if you mean as a Linksys router, then yes it can, and the configuration you described should work well
Andre, K6AH |
IP Logged
|
Member of:
Beta Test Team
San Diego Mesh Working Group
Running 3.0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Subject :Ubiquiti devices..
2014-07-12- 15:20:15
|
|
|
WF8S |
|
Member |
 |
Joined: 2013-11-05- 10:56:59
Posts: 19
Location: |
|
|
|
Forum :
Hardware
Topic :
Ubiquiti devices
Can these Ubiquiti devices be used the same way as a WEB router? I ordered one for my home station and was hoping to use it with a 16 port cisco 2960 switch up to the maximum number of ip's for system servers for my local HSMM group. I have a full Asterisk VOIP server, XMPP chat server , and email server ready to roll. |
IP Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subject :Email - Looking for hints..
2014-07-12- 15:19:51
|
|
|
n2xu |
|
Member |
 |
Joined: 2013-12-07- 10:33:05
Posts: 12
Location: Fort Walton Beach, Florida |
|
|
|
Forum :
Problems & Answers
Topic :
Email - Looking for hints
Looking for some gentle nudges in the right direction... I'm tinkering with on-mesh, mesh-only email. I envision a regional or nationwide mesh that will one day have email capability. Towards this end I built two raspberry pi email servers using information from http://www.samhobbs.co.uk/raspberry-pi-email-server. I used only the first two tutorials and did not include the SSL/TLS capabilities. Both Raspberry pi have names (nwf.local.mesh and fwb.local.mesh), they are attached to separate mesh nodes and I can connect to either one of them using the IP or the name without issue. I can set up a mail client that can receive mail and I can connect to both smtp servers on the mesh to send email. The problem I'm having is when one mail server attempts to connect to the other. My Mesh Configuration: (RF)-[N2XU-First]-cat5-[RasPi: fwb.mesh.local] (RF)-[N2XU-Second]-cat5-[RasPi: nwf.local.mesh] If I attempt to log onto fwb as pi@fwb.local.mesh and send mail from pi@fwb.local.mesh to pi@nwf.local.mesh on the other server the log says it can't find a MX for nwf.local.mesh. The email does show in the sent folder but never arrives in the pi@nwf.local.mesh inbox on the other server. Apparently it's doing a DNS lookup for the MX record of the other server. Is there a way to include MX records in the DNS records on the mesh nodes that will propagate across the mesh. I just encountered this a little while ago and did a search here on the forum for MX and didn't get any results. I don't believe that everyone will run an email server, but I do believe that there could and should be at least one somewhat local in each area... maybe by county, or region of a state. Has anyone else experimented with mesh only email with more than one email server? Thanks. Tom
|
IP Logged
|
73 de n2xu
Tom Cardinal/MSgt USAF (Ret)/BSCS, Security+ |
|
|
|
|
|
Subject :DHCP goof..
2014-07-12- 11:43:20
|
|
|
kj6czs |
|
Member |
 |
Joined: 2014-04-15- 13:36:39
Posts: 8
Location: |
|
|
|
Forum :
General
Topic :
DHCP goof
Real bad here... I turned DHCP off.. Don't ask my why I turned that off.. How do I get back to my nodes? I have both the Linksys and bullet devices.. I have like 8 nodes.. THanks
|
IP Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subject :WSB24 amplifier..
2014-07-12- 10:54:32
|
|
|
AI2Q |
|
Member |
 |
Joined: 2013-07-01- 17:58:56
Posts: 5
Location: Kennebunk, Maine |
|
|
|
Forum :
Hardware
Topic :
WSB24 amplifier
Anyone using the Linksys WSB24 "wireless signal booster" 2.4 GHz amplifier?
I have one here and am wondering if anyone has any experience with it?
Vy 73, AI2Q, Alex
|
IP Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subject :WSB24 amplifier..
2014-07-12- 10:54:28
|
|
|
AI2Q |
|
Member |
 |
Joined: 2013-07-01- 17:58:56
Posts: 5
Location: Kennebunk, Maine |
|
|
|
Forum :
Hardware
Topic :
WSB24 amplifier
Anyone using the Linksys WSB24 "wireless signal booster" 2.4 GHz amplifier?
I have one here and am wondering if anyone has any experience with it?
Vy 73, AI2Q, Alex
|
IP Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subject :Re:1.1.0 DNS Propagation..
2014-07-12- 01:35:40
|
|
|
W9HDG |
|
Member |
 |
Joined: 2013-08-20- 10:35:21
Posts: 17
Location: |
|
|
|
Forum :
Problems & Answers
Topic :
1.1.0 DNS Propagation
No worries Andre, I'm happy to help. I will report back this evening once I get back from taking my kids to the zoo. |
IP Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subject :Re:Pico 2 HP flash issue..
2014-07-12- 00:53:35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subject :Re:Pico 2 HP flash issue..
2014-07-11- 18:12:38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subject :WRT54G system time and WIFI connection..
2014-07-11- 18:00:04
|
|
|
M0NVQ |
|
Member |
 |
Joined: 2014-07-02- 15:53:04
Posts: 3
Location: Oldham, UK |
|
|
|
Forum :
Problems & Answers
Topic :
WRT54G system time and WIFI connection
Hi, I am new to HSMM but hoping to get better at it. I have a Linksys WET54G that is quite happily picking up the WIFI in my home. If I connect it via an Ethernet cable to my laptop running Ubuntu Linux, disable WIFI on the laptop but enable cable connection, I can still browse the internet. So I know the Linksys WET54G is working. However, when I connect the WET54G to my WRT54G running HSMM-Mesh on the internet input, the system time doesn't update. Therefore, I am sure that the WRT54G is getting a time signal but the set-up is wrong. Has anyone got any ideas on how I can get the WRT54G hear the WET54G please? Many thanks, Robert M0NVQ
|
IP Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subject :WRT54G system time and WIFI connection..
2014-07-11- 17:59:58
|
|
|
M0NVQ |
|
Member |
 |
Joined: 2014-07-02- 15:53:04
Posts: 3
Location: Oldham, UK |
|
|
|
Forum :
Problems & Answers
Topic :
WRT54G system time and WIFI connection
Hi, I am new to HSMM but hoping to get better at it. I have a Linksys WET54G that is quite happily picking up the WIFI in my home. If I connect it via an Ethernet cable to my laptop running Ubuntu Linux, disable WIFI on the laptop but enable cable connection, I can still browse the internet. So I know the Linksys WET54G is working. However, when I connect the WET54G to my WRT54G running HSMM-Mesh on the internet input, the system time doesn't update. Therefore, I am sure that the WRT54G is getting a time signal but the set-up is wrong. Has anyone got any ideas on how I can get the WRT54G hear the WET54G please? Many thanks, Robert M0NVQ
|
IP Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subject :Pico 2 HP flash issue..
2014-07-11- 16:47:31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subject :Re:Nodes..
2014-07-11- 16:14:46
|
|
|
M0NVQ |
|
Member |
 |
Joined: 2014-07-02- 15:53:04
Posts: 3
Location: Oldham, UK |
|
|
|
Forum :
UK
Topic :
Nodes
Hi, just new to HSMM and this is my first post.
One of my colleagues at Rochdale And District Amateur Radio Society (RADARS) G7DNM is keen to get nodes up and running in the Rochdale Lancashire area. I have a WRT54G updated with the firmware running at the moment. But I am not sure what I am going to do with it. I am on the map. There are possibly three or four other nodes up at the moment in the area but we are not in line of sight of each other.
Robert M0NVQ |
IP Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subject :Re:1.1.0 DNS Propagation..
2014-07-11- 15:39:12
|
|
|
K6AH |
|
Member |
 |
Joined: 2012-03-05- 10:47:45
Posts: 181
Location: San Diego, CA |
|
|
|
Forum :
Problems & Answers
Topic :
1.1.0 DNS Propagation
Travis, sorry, there were in fact two problems reported in this thread... and we appreciate your efforts also.
Andre, K6AH |
IP Logged
|
Member of:
Beta Test Team
San Diego Mesh Working Group
Running 3.0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Subject :Re:1.1.0 DNS Propagation..
2014-07-11- 15:27:41
|
|
|
W9HDG |
|
Member |
 |
Joined: 2013-08-20- 10:35:21
Posts: 17
Location: |
|
|
|
Forum :
Problems & Answers
Topic :
1.1.0 DNS Propagation
Thanks guys. I will give the new firmware a shot tomorrow and make sure the problem I originally reported has been resolved.
Travis |
IP Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subject :Re:1.1.0 DNS Propagation..
2014-07-11- 13:08:06
|
|
|
K6AH |
|
Member |
 |
Joined: 2012-03-05- 10:47:45
Posts: 181
Location: San Diego, CA |
|
|
|
Forum :
Problems & Answers
Topic :
1.1.0 DNS Propagation
Thanks to Peter, KF7PSM, for identifying the problem and helping to test this fix.
Andre, K6AH |
IP Logged
|
Member of:
Beta Test Team
San Diego Mesh Working Group
Running 3.0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Subject :Re:1.1.0 DNS Propagation..
2014-07-11- 12:47:14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subject :Re:Remote Firmware upgrade of node..
2014-07-11- 10:04:48
|
|
|
AE5CA |
|
Member |
 |
Joined: 2012-05-19- 21:52:33
Posts: 81
Location: |
|
|
|
Forum :
Firmware
Topic :
Remote Firmware upgrade of node
In theory this should work if you are able to connect to the remote node using the "meshnode" ssid for the setup phase. If you do not have a direct link then this is not going to work. I would practice at home before I attempted this. Worst case is you will have to get close enough to the node to make the "meshnode" connection. In my case I have a set of remote nodes that have to go through another set of nodes to get to my QTH. I can't use this method unless I drive close enough to the distant set of nodes to be able to get the "meshnode" connection. Also note that if you have multiple nodes at the remote location, you probably want to go to the site anyway to link them together with Ethernet cords. If you have just two nodes you can tie the lan ports on the poe together. If you have more than two connect the lan port to a switch (it doesn't have to be a managed switch) or if there is a WRT54 as the site just use the lan ports on it. The back to back connections dramatically improve the throughput of the node compared to connecting using the wifi. Clint Anderson, AE5CA |
IP Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subject :Remote Firmware upgrade of node..
2014-07-11- 08:28:52
|
|
|
AE6XE |
|
Member |
 |
Joined: 2013-11-05- 00:09:51
Posts: 116
Location: |
|
|
|
Forum :
Firmware
Topic :
Remote Firmware upgrade of node
I have tested a way to do remote upgrades of nodes that has worked for me "in the lab". Here's the scenario I tested: 1) Rocket M2 (device #1) with 1.0.1 firmware and access over mesh to device #3 below. This is the Target remote node to upgrade. 2) Bullet M2 (device #2) with UBNT factory firmware and configured in wireless settings: 2a) Wireless Mode = "Station" 2b) SSID = "MeshNode" 3) Bullet M2 (device #3) running 1.0.1 firmware with internet gateway and/or attached computer with the 1.1.1 firmware file previously downloaded. 4) Local computer with network cable plugged into device #2 in DHCP mode. Turn off wireless. (re-purpose computer in #3 at the appropriate step.) Steps to do remote upgrade (Line of sight sufficient for device #1 and #2 to communicate with each other given conditions and antennas): 1) Using the computer attached to device #3, remotely access setup of Device #1 and upload and/or download the 1.1.1 firmware version to perform the upgrade. Device #1 *should* go through full process and reboot with new firmware. Do "wscan" from Device #3's computer to confirm an SSID of "MeshNode" is showing and the step completed successfully. 2) Power on Device #2 (re-image device #3 with ubnt factory and configure) and align antenna with Device #1 antenna (still pointing to remote node which is now in AP mode waiting to be configured for the first time). 3) Power on computer and via Device #2 (acting like a layer 2 wifi to lan bridge), your laptop will receive a 192.168.1.x address (from device #1). 4) browse to "localnode:8080" and perform the setup with callsign, etc. and remotely reboot. 5) Now upgrade local Device #2 to 1.1.1 firmware. Note, in step 1, I said the node "should" reboot. When I did this for real on my 5-mile away node, it didn't complete :(, where as in the lab, it did :) . So no guarantees. Happy meshing! 73's AE6XE
|
IP Logged
|
|
|
|
|