|
Broadband-Hamnet™ Forum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subject :New Firmware Release 1.0.0..
2013-08-07- 02:04:44
|
|
|
wx5u |
|
Member |
|
Joined: 2013-01-02- 00:30:45
Posts: 188
Location: Austin, TX |
|
|
|
Forum :
Firmware
Topic :
New Firmware Release 1.0.0
Check my "Patching Beta" post in the beta forum.
[kd0nrc 2013-08-06- 11:57:48]: is there a patch for those of us running Beta r270? |
IP Logged
|
I'm not part of the development team, so take what I say with a grain of salt. I'm also easily confused.
Check out the free Wireless Networking Book |
|
|
|
|
|
Subject :Re:Raspberry Pi/Gumstix..
2013-08-06- 12:46:25
|
|
|
kf7ywp |
|
Member |
|
Joined: 2012-10-15- 09:08:03
Posts: 6
Location: |
|
|
|
Forum :
Hardware
Topic :
Raspberry Pi/Gumstix
Have you had a chance to adapt/test with the new version 1? |
IP Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subject :Re:New Firmware Release 1.0.0..
2013-08-06- 11:57:48
|
|
|
kd0nrc |
|
Member |
|
Joined: 2012-12-16- 01:27:52
Posts: 8
Location: Kansas City Metro Area |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subject :Re:HamChat Server..
2013-08-06- 09:56:34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subject :Re:New Firmware Release 1.0.0..
2013-08-06- 07:32:50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subject :Port Forwarding in 1.0.0..
2013-08-06- 05:12:05
|
|
|
KM2O |
|
Member |
|
Joined: 2012-09-22- 11:04:45
Posts: 25
Location: Albany NY |
|
|
|
Forum :
Problems & Answers
Topic :
Port Forwarding in 1.0.0
I have begun re-flashing nodes to 1.0.0. So far so good using the download via the setup administration route. The problem comes in port forwarding for devices and services. My first example is in making an IP camera available. In the last version all was well with the following in Port Forwarding: Interface: WiFi Type: TCP Lan IP: 172.27.0.5 LAN Port: 80 The link was then advertised and clickable across the MESH. Now the same screen in 1.0.0 does not allow anything but WAN for an Interface. I understand the LAN IP's have now changed to 10.67.184.xx. The camera is in the LAN IP with 10.67.184.93 and has been reserved. Nothing seems to work. Suggestions? Thanks Dave KM2O |
IP Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subject :Re:Re:New Firmware 1.0.0: clarification of behavior..
2013-08-06- 04:23:52
|
|
|
wx5u |
|
Member |
|
Joined: 2013-01-02- 00:30:45
Posts: 188
Location: Austin, TX |
|
|
|
Forum :
Firmware
Topic :
New Firmware 1.0.0: clarification of behavior
Connecting to a mesh node is almost exactly the same as connecting to a stock WRT54G router or normal wired ethernet network. The magic of the mesh is mostly hidden behind the DHCP server, the DNS server, and the routing function programmed into the mesh node. That's also true for a "normal" home router connection if you think about it.
The problem with Windows is that when you reconfigure the router, Windows tends to be slow about redoing the network configuration in terms of DNS, IP addresses, DHCP, ethernet up/down status, etc. Even Linux PCs may end up confused. This can happen even with a normal home router if you change something in the router configuration or swap routers.
Most of the time, the PC/Windows/Linux PC will eventually figure it out eventually. If it doesn't, you have to tinker. There are various shortcuts, but the safest bet is to reboot the PC after you change any configuration on the router is to reboot the PC. If your PC won't connect to a mesh node after reconfiguring something, try a reboot of the PC before spending too much time on the shortcuts.
[AB1PH 2013-08-06- 01:23:08]: 1) while I am not directly configuring a DNS server, DNS services are being created by default in the mesh. I need to make sure my clients attached to the mesh are properly configured to support the mesh's default DNS behavior ... AB1PH Don Rolph |
IP Logged
|
I'm not part of the development team, so take what I say with a grain of salt. I'm also easily confused.
Check out the free Wireless Networking Book |
|
|
|
|
|
Subject :BBHN Specs for People Developing Other Platform Nodes..
2013-08-06- 03:12:04
|
|
|
KG1L |
|
Member |
|
Joined: 2013-06-28- 12:53:53
Posts: 18
Location: Owings, MD |
|
|
|
Forum :
Firmware
Topic :
BBHN Specs for People Developing Other Platform Nodes
Now that the endian problem has been dealt with by removing the secure plugin, many wireless platforms could be configured to run BBHN. I understand that it is "not an easy task" to configure a differnent device, and that the current priorities are to support the listed LinkSys routers.
If it is not too much trouble, could someone post a list of the steps people would need to take to configure a random Linux distro to make a BBHN node? Eventually maybe a cookbook recipe that anyone could use, but for now, just a list that a knowlegable, experienced computer/network person could use, including a specification of what the node should be able to do.
I appologize if this already exists and I missed it in my search.
73 de KG1L
|
IP Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subject :Re:New Firmware Release 1.0.0..
2013-08-06- 03:04:03
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subject :Re:New Firmware 1.0.0: clarification of behavior..
2013-08-06- 01:23:08
|
|
|
AB1PH |
|
Member |
|
Joined: 2013-08-05- 06:38:53
Posts: 10
Location: Walpole, MA |
|
|
|
Forum :
Firmware
Topic :
New Firmware 1.0.0: clarification of behavior
Thanks for the response, I believe this clarifies my concern.
If I may summarize what I think I hear:
1) while I am not directly configuring a DNS server, DNS services are being created by default in the mesh. I need to make sure my clients attached to the mesh are properly configured to support the mesh's default DNS behavior 2) The address space is 10.0.0.0/8 providing room for the 5 local nodes to be directly attached to the mesh without address transaltion 3) HSSM mesh is using a hashing algorithm in the 10.0.0.0 space which minimizes the probability of collisions when two previously existing meshes are bridged. Also, I do need to be careful of the local names assigned to edge devices such as laptops. That clarifies my concerns. Thanks for the help. I will reimage my systems tonight and see if anything smokes! :-) 73, AB1PH Don Rolph |
IP Logged
|
73,
AB1PH
Don Rolph |
|
|
|
|
|
Subject :Raspberry PI & Asterisk..
2013-08-05- 20:32:55
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subject :Re:Raspberry PI & Asterisk..
2013-08-05- 17:37:57
|
|
|
K5YKG |
|
Member |
|
Joined: 2013-06-24- 16:33:19
Posts: 14
Location: Cypress, TX (NW Harris Co near Houston) |
|
|
|
Forum :
VoIP
Topic :
Raspberry PI & Asterisk
Thanks Glenn... I'll have to browse for that. Again, thanks for your excellent presentation and explanation at the Summerfest. You have whetted my appetite! 73.
Austin K5YKG |
IP Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subject :Re:Raspberry PI & Asterisk..
2013-08-05- 17:37:41
|
|
|
KD5MFW |
|
Admin |
|
Joined: 2010-01-18- 23:02:11
Posts: 104
Location: |
|
|
|
Forum :
VoIP
Topic :
Raspberry PI & Asterisk
Looks like the great editor edited out my link.
Go to the top right of the web page screen and do a search (using the search box) for KF5JIM and look for his video on the Pi PBX.
-Glenn
KD5MFW |
IP Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subject :Re:Raspberry PI & Asterisk..
2013-08-05- 17:33:43
|
|
|
KD5MFW |
|
Admin |
|
Joined: 2010-01-18- 23:02:11
Posts: 104
Location: |
|
|
|
Forum :
VoIP
Topic :
Raspberry PI & Asterisk
View the You Tube video for ALL the details of the Raspberry Pi Asterisk PBX set up. It explains everything.
-Glenn
KD5MFW |
IP Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subject :Raspberry PI & Asterisk..
2013-08-05- 17:19:32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subject :Re:New Firmware 1.0.0: clarification of behavior..
2013-08-05- 16:07:41
|
|
|
AD5OO |
|
Admin |
|
Joined: 2010-01-18- 23:05:42
Posts: 37
Location: |
|
|
|
Forum :
Firmware
Topic :
New Firmware 1.0.0: clarification of behavior
First, in our initial configuration, we are not attaching to the internet. Therefore there is no DNS structure in place. So it is unclear how we must get "DNS working". Thoughts? DNS is essential to the operation of the mesh. Whenever you are accessing a node or a service, you should never need to know an IP address. All nodes/services are accessed by name, and it is DNS that translates the names to addresses for you.
What is meant by "getting DNS working" is making sure the computer you connect to a mesh node will apply the settings that it is given through DHCP. Windows in particular seems to have its own ideas about how to configure DNS. Sometimes it is right, and sometimes it is not. If it is not, you are going to have trouble using the mesh.
Second: what exactly is 5 direct? 5 host direct mode means that the LAN subnet on the node has enough space for 5 addresses and they are directly accessible from the rest of the mesh.
Third: since we are creating dynamically assigned mesh structured, what happens with the 5 DIRECT algorithm when two previously independent meshes now get a bridging node which connects them? I could understand the behavior with NAT, but adding additional directly addressable nodes seems to have complicated this dynamic reconfiguration significantly. I'm not sure exactly what you are asking, and direct mode should actually remove complexity from the mesh. Simply setting up two or three mesh nodes with other computers or devices connected to each node LAN should help you see how it works.
|
IP Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subject :BeagleBone Black with Broadband-Hamnet?..
2013-08-05- 16:06:48
|
|
|
KD4E |
|
Member |
|
Joined: 2012-07-29- 13:39:05
Posts: 55
Location: Nevils in SE-Georgia, USA |
|
|
|
Forum :
Problems & Answers
Topic :
BeagleBone Black with Broadband-Hamnet?
This proof-of-concept success with a USB wifi nic suggests that a BeagleBone-Black may be paired with a Broadband-Hamnet router:
Has anyone tried?
|
IP Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subject :Re:Re:Related to New Firmware Release 1.0.0..
2013-08-05- 10:59:00
|
|
|
wx5u |
|
Member |
|
Joined: 2013-01-02- 00:30:45
Posts: 188
Location: Austin, TX |
|
|
|
Forum :
Firmware
Topic :
Related to New Firmware Release 1.0.0
That is correct. "Upload" the bbhn-1.0.0-brcm.trx file from your PC to the router.
If the mesh node has an internet connection, you can also install the bbhn-1.0.0-brcm.trx file directly under the download firmware section. Hit "refresh" and then the bbhn-1.0.0-brcm.trx file will be in the select firmware list. "Download" will then install the .trx file.
[KP4RV 2013-08-05- 09:43:40]: Hi Doug;
Thanks for the info do you mean to upload the file bbhn-1.0.0-brcm.trx on my WRT54G that has the previous version.
God Bless!
KP4RV- Rafael |
IP Logged
|
Last Edited On: 2013-08-05- 10:59:57 By wx5u for the Reason
|
I'm not part of the development team, so take what I say with a grain of salt. I'm also easily confused.
Check out the free Wireless Networking Book |
|
|
|
|
|
Subject :Re:New Firmware 1.0.0: clarification of behavior..
2013-08-05- 10:52:05
|
|
|
wx5u |
|
Member |
|
Joined: 2013-01-02- 00:30:45
Posts: 188
Location: Austin, TX |
|
|
|
Forum :
Firmware
Topic :
New Firmware 1.0.0: clarification of behavior
I believe there is a theoretical risk of a name or IP address collision once you connect two previously independent mesh networks. The wish list on the change log mentions "duplicate address/name detection."
We use the 10.x.x.x address range, so there are 16 million IP addresses. I believe the code allocates the IP addresses based on the MAC address of the router, so that makes collision less likely. To avoid name collisions, you should be sure that node names are unique. For instance, name one node "AB1PH-1" and another one "AB1PH-2". Bad things might happen if you have two with the same name. I suspect that you need to be careful about the name of your laptop as well. For instance, if I give my laptop a hostname of "lap," and someone else names their laptop "lap" as well, there might be a name collision as well if we both connect. They might both try to become "lap.local.mesh". If you have a laptop or other computer you're going to connect to a mesh node from time to time, you should probably give the computer a host name of "AB1PH-lap1" or something similar.
[AB1PH 2013-08-05- 08:21:18]:
Third: since we are creating dynamically assigned mesh structured, what happens with the 5 DIRECT algorithm when two previously independent meshes now get a bridging node which connects them? I could understand the behavior with NAT, but adding additional directly addressable nodes seems to have complicated this dynamic reconfiguration significantly.
|
IP Logged
|
I'm not part of the development team, so take what I say with a grain of salt. I'm also easily confused.
Check out the free Wireless Networking Book |
|
|
|
|
|
Subject :Re:irc (20.2) and new V1 of Broadband-HAMNET..
2013-08-05- 10:28:40
|
|
|
ae5ae |
|
Member |
|
Joined: 2010-10-27- 00:47:17
Posts: 144
Location: Van Alstyne, TX |
|
|
|
Forum :
Problems & Answers
Topic :
irc (20.2) and new V1 of Broadband-HAMNET
Steve, I put that message into the install script before I found out that the default mode was going to be DMZ/Direct mode. It's still correct for NAT mode. :-) Consequently, in v1.0.0 with the default DMZ mode, there is no firewall between the node and the wifi interface so poking a hole in the firewall is not necessary in that mode. All you can do now is just advertise the service if you want. -Rusty- |
IP Logged
|
|
|
|
|